Why do turntable purists prefer Thorens over Technics?

Discussion on Why do turntable purists prefer Thorens over Technics? within the Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers forums, part of the General Music Discussions at DiscoMusic.com category; By turntable purists I am talking about certain people who frequent record conventions and record shows. Most of them are ...


Go Back   Disco Music.com > General Music Discussions at DiscoMusic.com > Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers


| | | | Click here to buy & sell on eBay!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old February 1st, 2006, 01:21 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 265
Default Why do turntable purists prefer Thorens over Technics?

By turntable purists I am talking about certain people who frequent record conventions and record shows. Most of them are older. By older I mean people in their 50's and 60's. I remember listening in on a conversation while I was at this one dealer's table... "Technics is shit" "Never owned one never will"

Now this is quite fascinating because most younger people consider Technics turntables, especially the SL1200MK series to be the DJ industry standard. Mention the word Thorens to them and they will have no idea what you are talking about.

Are Thorens turntables superior?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old February 1st, 2006, 01:24 AM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 265
Default

Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old February 1st, 2006, 03:17 AM
RetroRuss's Avatar
*** Forum Leader / Moderator ***
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: London, England
Posts: 742
Default

The main difference is that Technic decks are more 'robust' plus you can adjust the pitch to help with that all important mixing, which is not possible with Thorens. Also you wouldn't want to put your Thorens in a club for every DJ to play with because they are bloody expensive!!

Soundwise they are brilliant but at the price you'd pay you would expect that!!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old February 1st, 2006, 06:28 AM
Noman's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Sweden
Posts: 319
Default

Reason No 1: A purists would never use a SL1200 or any player with "direct drive". (The motor is directly connected to the plate)

Optimal for the "purist" is when the motor is totally isolated...

Reason No2: And then we have the limited possibilities to set up the arm on a typical DJ player.If you are a purist you are willing to spend more money on Equipment just to measure and set up all the angles of the arm and cartridge than you have to pay for a complete SL1200. :)
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old February 1st, 2006, 07:17 AM
QUINNY's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SOUTHAMPTON,ENGLAND
Posts: 3,789
Default

:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Spellbound: You obviously have no idea about the lengths that some peole will go to, in order to find the best sound. I suspect that even the Thorens isn't good enough fore most.

Potentially, the best one I've encountered (and what should be an elegant solution) must be the laser equiped turntable that was mentioned on this site in a different thread about a year ago. I don't remember the name of it and quite frankly, I don't much care, but the idea of using a laser to track the grooves (rather like a CD) seemed to be a pretty nifty concept. However, having heard a sample, it did sound rather sterile and lifeless and the set up of it is rather difficult.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old February 1st, 2006, 09:18 AM
Graham_Start's Avatar
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,527
Default

Thorens is just one of the names that certain purists will worship. Others praise Linn, VPI, or any other number of vintage or contemporary manufacturers. While I don't dispute that these companies made a quality product, the adoration that some people apply to them smacks of fanboyism. Having said that...

Many purists frown on direct drive turntables because there used to be so many bad ones around, especially cheap consumer tables in the 80s. However, the 1200 is quite decent in this regard.

Others frown upon them because they are a mass-produced Japanese-made consumer product, and in their view, any such thing must therefore be inferior.

I've read claims from audiophiles that the 1200 has low-level fluctuations due to stylus drag. This is bullshit, plain and simple. The 1200 has rock-solid pitch stability, something that is almost impossible with a belt-drive table. The biggest issue with the sonics of the 1200 is that tonearm and the wiring leaves much to be desired. Back in the day, Technics made broadcast turntables that had a decent direct drive motor, but a detachable armboard so that you could fit whichever tonearm you liked onto the unit. When I hear younger people claim that the 1200 is the "best turntable EVAR!" I feel compelled to point out that it wasn't even the best turntable that Technics made.

There's an outfit in the UK that sells a kit that allows you to replace the 1200's tonearm with a Rega RB250 tonearm (a most excellent tonearm for the money). I've been wanting one of these as the best of both possible worlds, but I can't afford it. :(
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old February 1st, 2006, 12:27 PM
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Washington D.C.
Posts: 265
Default

Quote:
Spellbound: You obviously have no idea about the lengths that some peole will go to, in order to find the best sound. I suspect that even the Thorens isn't good enough fore most.
I have always thought the Technics 1200 was the best turntable one could buy. Well I guess I just fell for the hype. Most people my age worship that damn thing. Me personally I always try to have an open mind about everything. The only turntable I worship right now is my Vestax portable. It runs on batteries, has a headphone connection and pitch control. I can take it with me to the beach or listen to it while I am traveling by airplane or train. Once I did try to connect it to my home stereo system but the sound was not very good. I guess a decent pair of DJ headphones can give the impression the cartridge on the Vestax portable is of a higher quality.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old February 1st, 2006, 12:54 PM
Graham_Start's Avatar
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Spellbound
I have always thought the Technics 1200 was the best turntable one could buy.
It probably is as far as a DJ is concerned. As for listeners, that's another matter entirely.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old February 1st, 2006, 02:54 PM
originalbigm's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Brantford,ON Canada
Posts: 627
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by QUINNY
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
Spellbound: You obviously have no idea about the lengths that some peole will go to, in order to find the best sound. I suspect that even the Thorens isn't good enough fore most.

Potentially, the best one I've encountered (and what should be an elegant solution) must be the laser equiped turntable that was mentioned on this site in a different thread about a year ago. I don't remember the name of it and quite frankly, I don't much care, but the idea of using a laser to track the grooves (rather like a CD) seemed to be a pretty nifty concept. However, having heard a sample, it did sound rather sterile and lifeless and the set up of it is rather difficult.
It was an ELP turntable.For a more technical review and discussion refer to this link.

http://www.high-endaudio.com/RC-ELP.html
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old February 1st, 2006, 05:09 PM
QUINNY's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SOUTHAMPTON,ENGLAND
Posts: 3,789
Default

I love reading what these vinyl audiofiles have to say. They must be some of the most neurotic people in the world!!!

Remember, these are the people who would argue that vinyl sounds better than a CD from original master tapes and would probably argue that vinyl sounds better than the actual master tape itself. Although I'm willing to concede that it is possible that vinyl could subjectively sound different (and therefore better) to a master, I really don't know where they're coming from on many of the things they say and if a playback device has to be so, so precise for them to get off to the music, surely they're missing the whole point. They're in effect trying to hear things that maybe aren't there in the first place, weren't considered by the artists or producer and certainly weren't heard over the studio speakers, in some cases at 4 o'clock in the morning with a head full of coke, booze or both.

They're too precious by far!
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old February 1st, 2006, 05:50 PM
Graham_Start's Avatar
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,527
Default

Some of what they say is valid, but yes, a lot of it is nonsense. The best example I can think of with regards to audiophile fanaticism is how recently, on a prominent mastering engineer's forum, there was a thread comparing the mastering on numerous different pressings of the same CD. Brief snippets of two of these were posted, with the poster claiming that the second one had slightly better imaging and dynamics. Most people agreed.

That is, until someone synced up the two samples, and found that they were bit-for-bit identical. And yet, one person was still insisting that one was superior to the other.

Another example is the 30th anniversary vinyl pressing of Dark Side Of The Moon. A lot of work went into mastering this particular edition. This was well-documented, with detailed explanations of what was done and by whom.

There are people who insist that there is a better and an inferior-sounding cut of this release... despite the fact that it's been made clear that all of the 30th anniversary copies are pressed from the same stampers!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old February 2nd, 2006, 03:39 AM
QUINNY's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SOUTHAMPTON,ENGLAND
Posts: 3,789
Default

To loosely quote Murray Roman.
"Look at all these bananas rotting in the port. What're we gonna do, what are we gonna do? Well, we'll get some groovy guy to say you can get high on bananas."

Just about sums it up.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Turntable Advice: Technics vs Stanton Cdnbob Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers 6 June 1st, 2008 01:31 PM
Technics Turntable help jack Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers 6 August 27th, 2007 12:49 AM
FS: Technics SLDZ1200 Digital DJ CD Turntable + Memory 1GB SD Card *pic inside* blackstar07 Buy, Sell Or Trade Records, Electronics... 0 July 30th, 2006 09:31 AM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:10 AM.




Powered by: vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 1996-2008 by Disco Music.com - The Disco Music Source Since 1996
Ad Management by RedTyger