CD burning "directly"

Discussion on CD burning "directly" within the Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers forums, part of the General Music Discussions at DiscoMusic.com category; Hi, this is the story. Probably I do a souble work! Here it goes: If I have to record a ...


Go Back   Disco Music.com > General Music Discussions at DiscoMusic.com > Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers


| | | | Click here to buy & sell on eBay!

Reply
 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old July 28th, 2002, 09:49 AM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Italy
Posts: 486
Default

Hi, this is the story. Probably I do a souble work! Here it goes:
If I have to record a track onto a CD, first of all I will record the track on a normal tape (!) then I will connect the tape deck at the PC and I'll record onto the PC with GoldWave, then I burn with nero. But I think I do a double work.

Questions

1. Why I record -first of all- on the tape.
Because I can better monitor the recording level.

2. Can I connect the mixer out "directly" on the PC? But in this case how can I monitor the recording level?

3. Which is the best free program available in the Internet to record on PC? With good recording monitor capabilities?

4. Does exist a program that is capable to "compress" louder tracks to a previously selected recording level or capable to "elevate" lower tracks at this selected level?

Thanks,
Masdefi
__________________
People all over the world, It\'s time for love & understanding, Come together!!
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old August 3rd, 2002, 08:42 PM
disco1999's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Montreal
Posts: 769
Default

I don't know, but go to mp3machine.com there is a huge mp3 related collection of shareware, freeware.
__________________
If you buy this record your life, will be better.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old August 3rd, 2002, 10:24 PM
paul's Avatar
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: san diego
Posts: 3,736
Default

Hey Masdefi.
Why is it necessary to do compression? My understanding of cd is it's dynamic range is 96 db. Well recorded vinyl should give around 74 db at best. That still leaves over 20 db.
__________________
Find them and destroy them!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old August 4th, 2002, 01:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Italy
Posts: 486
Default

Quote:
On 2002-08-03 21:42, disco1999 wrote:
I don't know, but go to mp3machine.com there is a huge mp3 related collection of shareware, freeware.
Thanks, I'll check this site!
Masdefi
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old August 4th, 2002, 02:01 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Italy
Posts: 486
Default

Quote:
On 2002-08-03 23:24, paul wrote:
Hey Masdefi.
Why is it necessary to do compression? My understanding of cd is it's dynamic range is 96 db. Well recorded vinyl should give around 74 db at best. That still leaves over 20 db.
Yes but you can set up the recording level. But for example if you record a record with a higher sound you may create a peak over the maximum level and therefore the audio quality may decrease. I had when I was young a tape deck by Marantz (glorious mark) that had a LIMITER button that automatuically lowered the over sounds... I hope to explain ... But do you record "directly" from the record to the PC or you pass through the tape deck?!? :???:
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old August 4th, 2002, 02:56 PM
paul's Avatar
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: san diego
Posts: 3,736
Default

I haven't yet Masdefi but when I do I will do as you do. I will record my records on tape then burn to cd.
__________________
Find them and destroy them!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old August 20th, 2002, 10:05 AM
Junior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Posts: 6
Default

once you've transfered your songs to your computer, both realplayer and musicmatch can adjust the level on all tracks to be equal.It is not part of the free program .You would have to pay for the upgraded version.Winamp has a plugin for their player which does the same thing but I have tried it and that version does not work well.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old August 20th, 2002, 11:29 AM
QUINNY's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SOUTHAMPTON,ENGLAND
Posts: 3,789
Default

Masdefi: Get yourself a Minidisc recorder (not a portable one , they break too easily and have limited inputs.) They are fantastic machines these days. Wide flat frequency response, no distortion to speak of, low noise, at least 2 and a half hours on one disc in stereo (MDLP). Ability to move tracks, edit tracks, alter levels after recording, etc. What's more you should be able to hook up to your computer in digital if absolutely necessary. They are the best!!!

Otherwise: Recording to cassette first sorta defeats the object to some degree. By going to cassette you'll be potetially losing a lot of information, compressing the top end response, mistracking, adding wow and flutter and even more distortion.
I understand why you're doing it the way you are but it's slow, over complicated and really unecessary.
Invest in a Minidisc recorder. You'll never look back.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old August 20th, 2002, 12:45 PM
Graham_Start's Avatar
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
On 2002-08-04 15:01, Masdefi wrote:
But do you record "directly" from the record to the PC or you pass through the tape deck?!? :???:
As directly as I can... the turntable needs to go through a phono pre-amp first, to boost the output and apply the RIAA EQ curve. So it goes from my receiver to my sound card.

I use Cool Edit 2000, which allows you to monitor the input level while recording... although the output on my preamp is pretty low, so clipping is seldom an issue anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old August 20th, 2002, 12:53 PM
Graham_Start's Avatar
Distinguished Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,527
Default

Quote:
On 2002-08-04 15:01, Masdefi wrote:
But do you record "directly" from the record to the PC or you pass through the tape deck?!? :???:
As directly as I can... the turntable needs to go through a phono pre-amp first, to boost the output and apply the RIAA EQ curve. So it goes from my receiver to my sound card.

I use Cool Edit 2000, which allows you to monitor the input level while recording... although the output on my preamp is pretty low, so clipping is seldom an issue anyway.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old August 20th, 2002, 01:52 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Location: London, England
Posts: 971
Default

Quote:
On 2002-08-20 12:29, QUINNY wrote:
Masdefi: Get yourself a Minidisc recorder (not a portable one , they break too easily and have limited inputs.) They are fantastic machines these days. Wide flat frequency response, no distortion to speak of, low noise, at least 2 and a half hours on one disc in stereo (MDLP). Ability to move tracks, edit tracks, alter levels after recording, etc. What's more you should be able to hook up to your computer in digital if absolutely necessary. They are the best!!!

Invest in a Minidisc recorder. You'll never look back.
That's what I did!! Even though I "only" have a portable MD recorder, the sound quality through my hi-fi or on my headphones is stunning. And you have all the benefits of being able to edit, move, re-arrange etc.

Agree with you 100% Quinny!!

Are you reading this, Blax?? :grin: :grin:


__________________
If it moves - funk it!!
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old August 20th, 2002, 01:56 PM
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Porto Alegre - Brazil
Posts: 894
Default

Yep!!
__________________
SENHORES DO GROOVE - BRAZIL
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old August 20th, 2002, 06:03 PM
QUINNY's Avatar
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: SOUTHAMPTON,ENGLAND
Posts: 3,789
Default

Masdefi, Jazz, Blax: perhaps I should add that I have been a live/location recording engineer since 1982.
HOW GOOD IS MINIDISC?
let me put it this way.
In 1982 I bought a TASCAM reel to reel recorder that cost me roughly $1400.(allowing for inflation about what, $12000 in today's terms)
Today I can buy an all singing all dancing Minidisc Recorder that outperforms it in all aspects for$350. Even less if I wanted 'cos the latest Sony is currently $150
That's how good they are.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
CD burning - how many tracks? Masdefi Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers 7 June 6th, 2007 10:55 PM
Lyrics: "...You got the power to keep my fire burning.." gongorac Ask Others To Identify A Disco Song 3 January 11th, 2007 08:24 PM
Problems burning a protected WMA file nrgbeat Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers 3 August 4th, 2005 05:11 PM
CD Burning Software NickNack Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers 12 November 5th, 2003 09:13 PM
computer CD burning Leanmean Vinyl Record Care, Audio Restoration, MP3 & Computers 4 February 10th, 2003 05:27 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:16 AM.




Powered by: vBulletin®
Copyright ©2000 - 2008, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
SEO by vBSEO 3.2.0 ©2008, Crawlability, Inc.
© Copyright 1996-2008 by Disco Music.com - The Disco Music Source Since 1996
Ad Management by RedTyger