I hear ya Graham, BUT I'm NOT being facetious when I say I could not tell the new song from the old song. SAME RECORD--AND YET the crowd went wild. Now I realize the director told them to jump and scream--but it was like mixing "Superfreak" into "You Can't Touch This"--same exact rhythm track--and NO lyrics. NOT ONE human voice was heard in the soundtrack music to "Groove"-- No screaming diva sayin "Let's get soakin wet" every once in a while. NOOOOOO. Just an electronic beat ("oonce, oonce, oonce" music as Funky Dude called it). And yet the crowd screamed in delight when each new soundalike record was mixed in. Hmmmmmmm????
Now since the crowd doesn't give a **** what they are dancing to...what would happen if another type of dance tune were mixed in??? Would they immediately start barfing their guts out? Be taken in ambulances to the nearest hospital? Start massive lawsuits against the party planner for "harshing their buzz"?
Could they dance to a Giorgio Moroder electronic tune from back in tha day? Or is it simply that it would not sound as repititious as they are accustomed to? I'm curious what would happen if an non-conformist DJ played more melodic music at a rave? Would the ravers leave? Boo and hiss and vomit until they got their way?
Sirius, you play at those Balls in Vienna--what would happen if you played RAVE Music to your crowd??? They gotta be young kids--or am I wrong there? What is the bottom line here?
Who made "Rave Music" just an electronic beat with no vocals--no melodies, JUST A BEAT? And why has NO one ever challenged that concept of music? Hey, you can play that--but couldn't ya mix in something else every so often???
Obviously not. Since they don't.
"Lost inside adorable illusion...."
Bookmarks