FELLOW DJs/Remixers -- I loved Walter Gibbons. We were friendly as DJs and when he started doing all of his crazy remixes, I ate it up. His most outrageous, to me, was
Bettye Lavette, "Doin' the Best That I Can."
And TM may be godfather and all that, and he paved the way, etc., but I'm going to dare to issue my true feelings about how I felt in those days about his work.
Here goes.
I absolutely detested his mixes when I was a DJ. They were so PREDICTABLE, the opposite of Walter. In those days, TM had two mix structures. Tell me if I'm wrong:
1. Mix starts with standard song intro, verse, chorus, verse chorus as in the basic 45 [or album] mix, then break with 45 mix for instrumental verse, instrumental chorus,verse with BGs, chorus with BGs, then back to 45 mix where we left off, chorus, vamp and out. EXAMPLE:
Gloria Gaynor "Never Can Say Good-bye."
OR
2. Mix starts with intro of song as usual, but this time we have instrumental verse, instrumental chorus, then we go into vocal of song as is on the original, go through complete track, and then go back to instrumental choruses and out. Example: "I'll Be Holding On" by Al Downing.
Now, I'm sure there are slight variations, but basically, all the mixes were structured the same. Of course, the material was SO STRONG that it didn't matter. Also, mind you, I'm referring to structure, not the balance or EQs of the tracks. That was always top notch.
My feeling, however, was structure and balance of the track should be developed by the feel of the track, and that there should be a few more variations than the two I've outlined above. That is the way I approached every mix project. I didn't try to fit the song into a preset formula/structure.
Bookmarks