Results 1 to 18 of 18

Thread: Least Successful UK Top 40 artist

  1. #1
    Joined
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    178

    Least Successful UK Top 40 artist

    Came across this artist and song in a list of the "Least Successful UK Top 40 Artists". The criteria for the list was that the artist had one song that made Number 40 for one week, and then never achieved entry into the Top 40 with any other song, ever.

    Clue: Female artist, charted in the UK for one week at Number 40 in 1979.

  2. #2
    Joined
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    453
    Hi Billywho: Can't believe you posted this! I managed and produced the Most Successful Least Successful act in UK chart history (as pointed out in I think it was the 13th Edition of The Guinness Book Of Hit Singles). Let me explain:

    To be the Least Successful you need to spend just one week at the lowest possible UK chart position, #75. This has happened to a number of acts, but what happened to the Ruthless Rap Assassins, is unique. They had two singles make the chart, both in 1990, 'Just Mellow' and 'And It Wasn't A Dream', and, you've guessed, each of these records spent one week only at #75!

    I won't answer the question you set, but add these further clues:

    The track has a three word title and the label was hot.

  3. #3
    Joined
    Oct 2001
    Location
    London, England
    Posts
    960
    Was it Chantal Curtis - Get Another Love??
    If it moves - funk it!!

  4. #4
    Joined
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Written by jazz_pilgrim
    Was it Chantal Curtis - Get Another Love??
    No, unfortunately it wasn't. Don't think that got anywhere near the charts, but I'm sure I'll be corrected if I'm wrong.

    Another clue: Armand Van Helden.

  5. #5
    Joined
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    453
    Billywho: Didn't get quite as high as #40, but 'Get Another Love' did manage to reach #51 in the UK.

    Another clue:

    First word of title and surname of artist both have five letters.

  6. #6
    Joined
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    3,145
    Quote Originally Written by billywho
    Another clue: Armand Van Helden.
    Hmm... I can't think of any artists or songs named "suck"...

  7. #7
    Joined
    Mar 2003
    Location
    Merseyside
    Posts
    453
    Seeing nobody has answered yet, a final clue:

    Top 40 hits in the UK on the same label during the late 70's/early 80's by Shalamar, Dynasty and The Whispers.

  8. #8
    Joined
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    609
    A wild guess, based solely on a few of the clues: "Dance With You" by Carrie Lucas...?
    \"...a once in a lifetime feeling that returns every week...\"

  9. #9
    Joined
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Written by Jeff H
    A wild guess, based solely on a few of the clues: "Dance With You" by Carrie Lucas...?
    Hooray!

    You win the prize, Jeff H, but unfortunately I don't have one to give away...

    What's your favourite Carrie Lucas tune? Mine is "It's Not What You Got (It's How You Use It)".

    Have a look here for the list of least successful UK chart artists and songs, along with lots of other UK chart trivia.
    http://www.everyhit.com/record2.html

  10. #10
    Joined
    Nov 2001
    Location
    Pittsburgh
    Posts
    609
    I guess my favo(u)rite Carrie Lucas song is "Dance With You," which probably explains how I was able to guess the answer to your quiz.

    I still don't get the Armand Van Helden clue (did he do a remix of the song?), but I do agree with Graham's assessment of his "talent."

  11. #11
    Joined
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Written by Jeff H
    I still don't get the Armand Van Helden clue (did he do a remix of the song?), but I do agree with Graham's assessment of his "talent."
    "Dance With You" was sampled in "You Don't Know Me" by Armand Van Helden, a huge tune in the UK, though I'm not sure how big it was elsewhere.

    I can't quibble with Graham's assessment because I haven't heard much else by Armand Van Helden, and anyway I have little interest in today's dance music "personalities". But, for me, "You Don't Know Me" was a fabulous tune.

  12. #12
    markydefad's Avatar
    markydefad is offline Triple Platinum Record [Level 10]
    Joined
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    8,269
    I bought one thing by Mr. Van Helden--"The Funk Phenomena" (repititious but catchy) which they used to play on Groove Radio. Everything else I ever heard sucked like Monica Lewinsky on her knees in the Oval Office. :oops: :P :oops: :P :oops: :P
    "Lost inside adorable illusion...."

  13. #13
    Joined
    Oct 2001
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    3,145
    Quote Originally Written by billywho
    I can't quibble with Graham's assessment because I haven't heard much else by Armand Van Helden, and anyway I have little interest in today's dance music "personalities".
    The success of blandfill like AVH's work is the reason why you (and I) have no interest in today's dance music. Funny how someone who's considered a "personality" makes music that is so boring, monotonous, unimaginitive, and utterly lacking in personality.

    Was that my outside voice?

  14. #14
    Joined
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Written by Graham Start
    The success of blandfill like AVH's work is the reason why you (and I) have no interest in today's dance music. Funny how someone who's considered a "personality" makes music that is so boring, monotonous, unimaginitive, and utterly lacking in personality.
    I'm probably not as anti today's dance music as you are, Graham, in fact, I like some of the stuff I hear very much. But I have no interest in it. Even for tunes I enjoy, I couldn't care less who the artist is, or whether he produces another song in the remainder of his career. Armand Van Helden's "You Don't Know Me" is a case in point. There is so much stuff out these days, and there's many a modern dance tune I've heard and enjoyed, then never heard it again, because I simply don't have the desire to find out who the artist is or even what it's called. It's musical wallpaper (or "blandfill" as you called it), but it enables my gym sessions to pass pleasantly enough. Yes, I'd prefer to have Cocomotion on instead (in fact I'd prefer anything pre-85 to all of today's dance music output), but I don't think it would please the other gym occupants...

  15. #15
    SandraDee's Avatar
    SandraDee is offline Double Platinum Record [Level 9]
    Joined
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    5,357
    I know I'm late with this Billywho but I had to say I feel so much the same as u do re post-1990 (I go a bit further than '85 :) dance music; I've got a passing interest in what's happening & i actually quite like some acid jazz & nu-disco/house stuff but I just can't get interested in the artists or music like I do with the older dance/disco stuff. Today's stuff, even the classier stuff, just seems so disposable, while older disco, even the cheesier stuff is so much more INTERESTING, dont u think?!
    ...ya gotta beat the street......

  16. #16
    Joined
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    178
    Quote Originally Written by Steely Dan
    I know I'm late with this Billywho but I had to say I feel so much the same as u do re post-1990 (I go a bit further than '85 :) dance music; I've got a passing interest in what's happening & i actually quite like some acid jazz & nu-disco/house stuff but I just can't get interested in the artists or music like I do with the older dance/disco stuff. Today's stuff, even the classier stuff, just seems so disposable, while older disco, even the cheesier stuff is so much more INTERESTING, dont u think?!
    I suppose it's just a specific case of the universal law that when you get a surfeit of anything, then you gradually lose interest in it. Today we're being subjected to a massive overdose of similar sounding songs, and the resulting lack of interest and passion on behalf of the audience is entirely predictable. This is an extremely hypothetical question, I know, but I wonder what the reaction would have been if [insert any moderately decent modern trance track here] had been released in 1983.

    I'll let you off about the 85/90 thing (!); I think you're right about there being a cut-off point around 1990, when techno and rave music started to completely take over (that's not to say I didn't enjoy it - I have a huge number of techno and rave CDs that I'll get around to selling one of these days). As regards "dance", things went gradually downhill between 85 and 90 (I don't really have any big favourites after 85), but of course in 86 House music took off in a big way, and I still remember well the excitement I felt on hearing the early Farley Jackmaster Funk stuff.

  17. #17
    SandraDee's Avatar
    SandraDee is offline Double Platinum Record [Level 9]
    Joined
    Mar 2002
    Location
    Manchester, UK
    Posts
    5,357
    Oh yes, I thought house music in '86 was tremendously exciting & different, & I too loved Farley Jackmaster funk's 'Love Cant turn Around' but can u believe its still around 17 years later in a slightly different format (come on, admit that current 'nu -disco' such as the Hed Kandi stuff isn't that much different to the '86 stuff). It really is about time for something different but I s'pose the technology today doesn't allow for originality!
    ...ya gotta beat the street......

  18. #18
    Joined
    Apr 2002
    Location
    Swindon, UK
    Posts
    178


     

     

    Quote Originally Written by Steely Dan
    Can u believe its still around 17 years later in a slightly different format (come on, admit that current 'nu -disco' such as the Hed Kandi stuff isn't that much different to the '86 stuff). It really is about time for something different but I s'pose the technology today doesn't allow for originality!
    I certainly think trance, which still seems to be popular, hasn't changed one iota in at least 10 years. Amazing longevity, really, when you think about it. I can pick up and play one of the trance compilation CDs I bought in, say, '92, and you couldn't tell any difference between it and the tracks you hear today. I still remember when Gat Decor's "Passion" and Jam And Spoon's "Stella" appeared, and how radical and exciting they were at the time, probably the first two trance tunes I ever heard.

    Things will change when "the buying public" (whoever they may be) get bored and want something different. You can't force the issue. Things take their natural course. Doesn't really matter to me, since, when I have the choice, I listen to late 70s/early 80s music, and will continue to do so.

Similar Threads

  1. Why was Arabesque not more successful?
    By Nadia in Disco Dance Music, Artists, DJs and History
    Replies: 20
    Last Entry: December 12th, 2009, 01:18 AM
  2. Most successful British Northern Soul artists?
    By PhyllisHyman in Disco Dance Music, Artists, DJs and History
    Replies: 4
    Last Entry: July 25th, 2007, 01:34 AM
  3. Top 40/successful Disco Versus Non-successful/hard Disco
    By garrybcoston in Disco Dance Music, Artists, DJs and History
    Replies: 2
    Last Entry: October 1st, 2006, 09:52 AM
  4. Yahoo question for today "Why was disco so successful?"
    By needlefingers in Disco Dance Music, Artists, DJs and History
    Replies: 4
    Last Entry: July 4th, 2006, 07:47 AM
  5. Why Italo - German Disco Was Not Successful In The US
    By bazac in Disco Dance Music, Artists, DJs and History
    Replies: 15
    Last Entry: June 5th, 2006, 06:35 PM

Bookmarks

Permissions

  • You may not Start New Discussions
  • You may not add a reply
  • You may not add attachments
  • You may not edit your entries
  •