Hi Eric,
Not sure if this helps resolve the question, but here is what I know:
I am aware of 2 different US pressings of the TGIF lp... first pressings have the original, non-electronic version of Diana Ross' Lovin', Livin' & Givin' while second pressings have the electronic version (which was also released on the Motown commercial 12").
The label on my second pressing TGIF lp says that Last Dance has a running time of 6:58 (not 7:17); the label running time on the US promo 12" is 8:10. I synched up the lp and 12" on my turntables and both versions are the same length, which according to my stopwatch is about 8:10. So you are right about the lp being mislabeled.
Normally when the audio content on a vinyl record has been revised after it has been released, you will see something in the trailoff vinyl which indicates this has been done... usually (at least in the US), they use "RE 1" to indicate that revised master #1 is being used. Side 4 of my second press lp is etched "RE 1", indicating that the Diana Ross track has been changed from the non-electronic version to the electronic version. I remember discovering the alternate pressing back in '78, shortly after the lp was issued. The club I was playing in had 2 copies of the TGIF lp. I was running out of time on the song that was playing so I quickly threw the lp without enough time to preview it in the headphones. I thought I was gonna hear that synthesizer intro of the version I had always played, but.... YIKES! :o This cheese-ball orchestrated version came on and it completely cleared the floor. :evil: What a piece of shite that first version was. Sorry to digress!
Sooo.... if the first pressing featured a different mix of Last Dance, side 1 on my second pressing should be etched with an "RE something" in the trailoff vinyl. It is not. Only side 4 with the Diana Ross remix shows a revision marking. This tells me that first and second pressings of the U.S. TGIF lp featured the 8:10 mix and that it is incorrectly labeled as 6:58.
It is very possible that this confusion arose from the mislabeling... or there could possibly be a later US pressing (not sure one was made, but possible). Or there could be a foreign pressing or a CD reissue with this mystery mix. While this does not answer your question, I think you can rule out first and second US vinyl pressings.
Hope this helps!
Kevin
in-the-groove



Reply With Quote
Bookmarks