Condoleeza Rice!
She's brilliant AND she ain't a communist!
My fellow Americans! Just read an interesting article in a European political magazine where analists predict that the next President of the U.S. will certainly be a woman. The only question for them is wether it will be Miss Rice or Mrs. Clinton.
The bets or on. What do you guys/girls think? Or will it be another member of the Bush-dynasty. Or will it be Mr. Heinz?
Condoleeza Rice!
She's brilliant AND she ain't a communist!
I don't like either. I know the Dem party is trying to shove Hillary down our throats but I prefer other people.
I doubt the Repubs will give the spot to Condi. I wouldn't vote for her anyway.
Think of all the sistas who would?
Condi would win by a landslide!!!
I hope your female leader is better than ours was! :evil:
Why wouldn't you vote for Condi Paul?
The First African American President!
And female! Monumental!!!!!!!!!!
Dr. King would rise from his grave and give thanks!
Well Hillary VS. Condi would give equal opportunity to those who engage in the LESBIAN SMEAR CAMPAIGN rumors. Both are suspect. :P
A carpet muncher for president...How queer:lol:
Perhaps you're reaching with the Dr King assumption.Originally Written by DiscoMan
Anyway, I vote issues. While I would love an African-American man or woman, if there policies are wrong then I can't support 'em. There are good African-American women out there like Carol Braun or Maxine Waters 8)
Isn't Carol Braun a welfare cheat?
Didn't Maxine Waters attend the Robert Mugabe University of Political Science?
You made assertions that you yourself should support.Originally Written by DiscoMan
I still don't see what the big deal is about Hillary Clinton. Unfortunately she is my Senator. She has never faced a tough interview and if you think 'War Hero' John Kerry was savaged in '04, wait till you see what happens to Hillary in '08. Condi Rice has not expressed any interest in running for national office, so all this Condi vs. Hillary talk may be fun but nothing else.
A republican to watch is George Allen of Virginia. He's a conservative from a growing part of the country and comes across well on TV. McCain can't hope to get the nominantion because although he's a conservative, his antics and self-promotion have alienated him from the conservative base of the republican party. Rudy Giuliani has a similar problem. His social liberalism doesn't sit well with a lot of the base, but he has a better chance than McCain at getting the nomination.
All you democrats out there, who else besides Queen Hillary has a shot at your party's nomination??
Angela Davis and Fidel Castro.All you democrats out there, who else besides Queen Hillary has a shot at your party's nomination??
Ha! Angela Davis and Fidel Castro might be too conservative for the democratic base, especially here in NY and up in MA. Too bad Mao Zedong and Ho Chi Minh aren't around to fill out the 2008 dem ticket.
Or Pol Pot their poster boy from the late '70s.
Yep, that's always amazing. The Lefties (who consider themselves as THE intellectuals) never criticise complete nutcases and massmurderers like Mao, Stalin, Pol Pot, Ceaucescu, Honecker and other "Fine" :o leaders of the glorious left. Quite astonishing.
Our Belgian Socialist leader frequently went to Cuba and shouted out his love for Il Fidelio Castrato. And BTW Belgians donated large amounts of money to the people of Thailand after the Tsunami. There even were national Telethons to collect money.
Which is great but...after the Hurricane atrocities in the USA, they did nothing. Journalists from our national station VRT (widely considered as a red station) were almost mocking the situation there. "OMG look at these Americans", that was the general comment. This has caused an outrage with many conservatives over here but our Socies and Green Commies never said 1 word in favour of the US. I think they're still mad because the USA liberated us in 1945 and that the Soviets were stopped in Berlin.
Where's the common sense in all that? People who are in need, should be helped!
As a loyal American whose grandparents sent four sons to fight in WWII and save you Euros from your ignorant, primitive selves (except Videoskooter and other honorable, conservative Euros) I'm now reassessing the American role in saving Europe thrice in 70 years.
Big mistake.
We should have let the nazis and soviets consume you in the hell of oppression, murder, national socialism and communism.
If it were within my power I would return all of our war dead from WWI and WWII to their native soil.
When al-Qaeda murders more cowardly Euros on the bus or at work or in a restaurant I will have a certain "Serves 'em right for they are reaping what they have sowed" attitude.
An example: I would spend an average $120.00 USD on Frog wine monthly or $1440.00 a year. I haven't bought a bottle of Frog wine in 4 years. F*ck 'em.
If DiscoMan is typical, conservative Americans are very dangerous people. I'm surprised they haven't yet fully enabled their isolationist, utopian, gun totin' dream to become a permanent reality. Perhaps they could do us all a favour and shoot each other, whilst declaring their inalienable right to carry firearms, but of course, that would be mighty difficult with their heads firmly stuck in the sand.
The world might be a better place though.:lol:
A freudian slip :o :lol: :lol: :lol:analists
Why be nice when many/most europeans consider the U.S. to be the greatest danger in the world today and don't consider themselves to be allies of the U.S?
Our heads aren't stuck in the sand as europe is now a clear and present danger to the United States.
Well aside from Hillary, IMHO the DC insider Dems also favor Biden and a Governor from Virginia who's name I can't remember.Originally Written by dfc99bb
The base and grassroots still heavily lean toward Dean or Gore.
Hillary is a smart woman is in fact much better at interviews than Kerry in my opinion. My problem with Hillary is her vote to support shrub for war in Iraq, and pandering to seemingly right of center issues.
It's true, at some point in the future, the USA and Europe will be fighting each other, either militarily or in some other less openely destructive way. The USA will be a spent force in the not too distant future, as you're showing the classsic signs of a country that's had its time. Your isolationism hasn't helped and won't help you to face the challenges that await us all. That's one of the reasons why we're expanding the European Community and forging more positive links with emerging superpowers. We realise that the future world order is gonna change and we still need to be in there somewhere, whereas you think you can do it on your own.Originally Written by DiscoMan
Genghis Khan and the Eastern hordes damn near conquered europe in the 13th Century (only his death prevented it).
This time they'll succeed.
And you euros are so good at surrender especially the frogs.
If the USA was part of an extended land mass, consisting many disparate countries and religions, it would have been conquered plenty of times....make no mistake.
If we hadn't managed to stop Hitler invading Britain in 1940, the USA would have ended up either making a deal with him or more likely, surrendering to him in 1943/44 when countless rockets would have reigned terror on the population of the eastern seaboard. You would have had absolutely no answer to these or the nuclear bombs that would have followed shortly after.
Good job you came to the party (albeit rather late on) to save our asses.![]()
Bookmarks