Question for LGBT community

[paul]

Originally Posted by Salsoul1975

You're the one who said it, not me.

Not surprised to see your response. As expected from republicans, they run snd scurry like cockraoches when the light of truth hits them. So now you're playing bush...err dumb by trying to distance yourself from what you said, typical.
Quoting you:

because they refuse to pigeonhole themselves or their kind into a poisonous constituency, the same way blacks, Latins, feminazis, etc. have?

[paul]

Originally Posted by Salsoul1975

The naivete schtick isn't working.

Schtick, hardly. As I've demonstrated above you guys can't face up to what you say.
You guys use words like feminazi and when confronted to articulate what you mean you can't address it!

[paul]

Whoa Boodi, Terry is someone I haven't heard about in years. Did he ever come out the hypocrite closet? 8)

[Boodikka]

Paul, Dolan left this earthly plane in Roy Cohn fashion, a self-loathing, self-denying Quisling 'til the bitter end.

[Salsoul1975]

Originally Posted by paul

Not surprised to see your response. As expected from republicans, they run snd scurry like cockraoches when the light of truth hits them. So now you're playing bush...err dumb by trying to distance yourself from what you said, typical.
Quoting you:

because they refuse to pigeonhole themselves or their kind into a poisonous constituency, the same way blacks, Latins, feminazis, etc. have?

You make the ultimate generalization of myself. I am neither Republican nor Democratic. Constituencies...if this country truly believes that all races are "equal", then there would be no need for organizations like the Congressional Black Caucus and NAACP in 2006. As long as we still have these agitator groups playing the "blame Whitey" game they are digging themselves further down the hole. Latin organizations are not going to win the hearts of the majority because views on immigration and Spanish as the official language are not entirely in their favor.

I am homosexual and to me, GLAAD is the NAACP of gay organizations. Their sole purpose of existence is to raise a stink whenever a non-homosexual does or says something that goes against their agenda. They get their panties in an iron bunch. So much for "tolerance" that they, along with other gay organizations, have been force-feeding on the public.

That goes for feminazis too. NOW should just hang it up already. They have never been relevant, and as long as they keep whining about our country being lorded over by a "heterosexual White patriarchy", no one is gonna either care or listen.

[paul]

Well Salsoul you've touched on some worthy topics. To bring this back on topic, are you opposed to outing hypocrite politicians?

[Mixmachine]

Originally Posted by paul

Well Salsoul you've touched on some worthy topics. To bring this back on topic, are you opposed to outing hypocrite politicians?

Hey Paul , that's all you've got to say to that last post???? :lol::lol::lol: hillarious :lol::lol:
I think you got cought with your pants down !!! and Salsoul75 took you to the cleaners. I can't stop laughing :lol::lol::lol:

[paul]

Originally Posted by Mixmachine

Hey Paul , that's all you've got to say to that last post???? :lol::lol::lol: hillarious :lol::lol:
I think you got cought with your pants down !!! and Salsoul75 took you to the cleaners. I can't stop laughing :lol::lol::lol:

And you also believe everything is fine in Iraq. 8)
Actually I would love to engage those issues. Perhaps you can start that thread Mix.
So back to the topic of outing...

[Videoskooter]

What surprises me is the fact that the Gay-Politicians stuff is still that harsh in the US. In Belgium we probably gonna have a gay prime-minister next year and we really don't make a problem of it you know.

Elio Di Rupo (PRO: He's Italian :) CONTRA: He's a Socialist :x )

[markydefad]

Videoskooter,

In case you haven't noticed--only straight (!) WHITE MEN have ever been elected President in the USA. So, if women, Jews, African-Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans have not been able to cross that barrier--look at the back of the bus & find the GAYS!!! The U.S had laws making sexual contact between 2 consenting adults of the same sex illegal in places like Texas until the Supreme Court overruled those laws--and that was just a few years ago!!! And several SUPREMES, Scalia in particular, fought against that like wild cats. So I doubt if a GAY is gonna get a push for President anytime soon....

We felt we made a major stride in equality by electing a CATHOLIC with JFK in the early Sixties...now there is talk of Barack Obama, an African American senator making the leap into the next presidential race--but, in case you haven't noticed-- we in the USA be way behind the examples set by the rest of the world.

At present our government appears to be reaching back to Germany in the Thirites for our political vision. SCARE-EEEEEEEY!!!! :-x:-x:-x :oops::oops::oops:

[Salsoul1975]

Originally Posted by markydefad

In case you haven't noticed--only straight (!) WHITE MEN have ever been elected President in the USA.

Because that's how the majority of the votes have gone. It's what the voters want (read: average ordinary citizens), not what academia, the entertainment industry, large corporations and the block voting establishment want.

So, if women, Jews, African-Americans, Hispanic Americans, Asian Americans have not been able to cross that barrier--

They've come close in the past. Geraldine Ferraro (female) and Jesse Jackson (black) ran for vice-president and president, respectively, in 1984.

now there is talk of Barak Obama, an African American senator making the leap into the next presidential race

Barack Obama is a mulatto, but in America, someone who is half or even a quarter black is officially designated "black". So much for the joys of "diversity" and the talk we hear about how wonderful it is to be made up of different racial characteristics. As for Obama "making the leap" into the Presidential race, the media is doing the leap for him. The same way they did with Hillary Clinton last year (and to a lesser extent, Condi Rice). The media tells us that Obama is the greatest thing since sliced bread and that he has the charisma and allure of a "rock star". Hmmmm...and I bet that if by chance he lost the race to become President, the people who voted for the other man would be accused of "racism" for not voting for Obama. I guarantee it, and then you'll hear about the need for more "mandatory sensitivity training" and "diversity" in all nooks-and-crannies.

but, in case you haven't noticed-- we in the USA be way behind the examples set by the rest of the world.

What examples?

At present our government appears to be reaching back to Germany in the Thirites for our political vision. SCARE-EEEEEEEY!!!! :-x:-x:-x :oops::oops::oops:

Zzzzzz...another reference to the Western world's fantasy bedroom partners. If America can't get enough of comparing everything that is wrong with the world to National Socialists, then it makes your analogy null and void.

[markydefad]

:lol::lol::lol:Salsoul, I guess I hardly knew ye!!!!:D:D:D

Hmmm...I always assumed we were on the same side--now I see we have differences!!! ;-) Quelle surprise!!!

This topic seems to have touched a nerve. :roll: I'm guessing my steel-toed Liberal engineer boots have stomped on your Log Cabin open-toed espadrilles!!!
Anyway, something's "afoot"... so to speak...toes stepped on??? :o:o:o

[markydefad]

markydefad Quote: (something like this) "we in the USA be a bit behind the rest of the world...."

Originally Posted by Salsoul1975

What examples?

How about these?:

5 current and former presidents and prime ministers: Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan; Mary Robinson, Ireland; Khaleda Zia, Bangladesh; Vigdis Finnbogadottir, Iceland; Tansu Ciller, Turkey; Eugenia Charles, Dominica; Violeta Chamorro, Nicaragua; Gro Harlem Bruntland, Norway; and former leaders Corazon Aquino, Philippines; Sirimavo Bandaranaike, Sri Lanka; Edith Cresson, France; Maria Liberia-Peters, Netherlands Antilles; Kazimiera Prunskiene, Lithuania; Hanna Suchoka, Poland; Margaret Thatcher, Great Britain.

Indira Gandi--the prime minister of India, 1966-77 and 1980-84.
Golda Meir-- the first female Prime Minister for the State of Israel
Kim Campbell, Canadian Prime Minister

[Salsoul1975]

Originally Posted by markydefad

This topic seems to have touched a nerve. :roll: I'm guessing my Liberal engineer boots have stomped on your Log Cabin open-toed espadrilles!!!
Anyway, something's "afoot"... so to speak...toes stepped on??? :o:o:o

If you read one of my earlier posts on this thread, I said I was neither Republican nor Democratic. Looks like your leftist engineer boots will have to stomp on someone else's.

[Salsoul1975]

Originally Posted by markydefad

How about these?:

5 current and former presidents and prime ministers: Benazir Bhutto, Pakistan; Mary Robinson, Ireland; Khaleda Zia, Bangladesh; Vigdis Finnbogadottir, Iceland; Tansu Ciller, Turkey; Eugenia Charles, Dominica; Violeta Chamorro, Nicaragua; Gro Harlem Bruntland, Norway; and former leaders Corazon Aquino, Philippines; Sirimavo Bandaranaike, Sri Lanka; Edith Cresson, France; Maria Liberia-Peters, Netherlands Antilles; Kazimiera Prunskiene, Lithuania; Hanna Suchoka, Poland; Margaret Thatcher, Great Britain.

Indira Gandi--the prime minister of India, 1966-77 and 1980-84.
Golda Meir-- the first female Prime Minister for the State of Israel
Kim Campbell, Canadian Prime Minister

Countries outside the United States may not see sex as a factor in voting for presidents and prime ministers, but that is because unlike non-U.S. nations, our country still has a solid Christian-based mentality. Although these days too many are afraid to publicly say it for fear of offending the politically correct Gestapo, Americans have a hard time seeing a woman in the role of President.