Cindy Sheehan Arrested

[paul]

In the land of the free and home of the brave as interpreted by the bush crime family and the punk democrats, you will be arrested for wearing unflattering clothing. Cindy, whose son was killed in Iraq was arrested for wearing a T-shirt showing the number of US soldiers killed in Iraq. The little dictator, aka bush don't like that bit of news when he's spewing his propaganda to the sheep!

http://www.cnn.com/2006/POLITICS/01/...est/index.html

[DiscoMan]

Cindy Sheehan needs to spend a weekend with 3 or 4 fellas, each packin' about 3-1/2 pounds o' tube steak, to straighten her f**ked up ass right out. Shit, I might even put a flag over her face and f**k her for glory myself.

[paul]

Originally Posted by DiscoMan

Cindy Sheehan needs to spend a weekend with 3 or 4 fellas, each packin' about 3-1/2 pounds o' tube steak, to straighten her f**ked up ass right out. Shit, I might even put a flag over her face and f**k her for glory myself.

I feel the same about MAnn Coulter though I have some reservations cause I see tranny when I see her.

[DiscoMan]

Paul, just imagine the Good Times you and I could have with these
O deprived women! :D Shit man, we could even double team sweet Ann... 8)

[Mixmachine]

Originally Posted by paul

In the land of the free and home of the brave as interpreted by the bush crime family and the punk democrats, you will be arrested for wearing unflattering clothing. Cindy, whose son was killed in Iraq was arrested for wearing a T-shirt showing the number of US soldiers killed in Iraq. The little dictator, aka bush don't like that bit of news when he's spewing his propaganda to the sheep!

they should have stopped her at the border after she came back from the meeting with every enemy on the USA in Venezuela, especially those that would like nothing more that starve and murder you and your family, but of course you can't find that link either...

She's using the death of her son, that decided to serve his country (not she!!!)for political reasons, and she's financed and supported by leftist from all over the world now, including your friend Yugo, she calls Iraqui murdering terrorist "Freedom fighters" insulting the memory of all those she claims to represent in her shirt, a remark especially insulting to the families of other fallen soldiers the majority of which cannot stand the fucking bitch!!!!!

By the way I'm sure Salon.com didn't report it, and since you are such an *unbias* guy you decided to keep out, the Wife of a Republican Senator was also removed from the chambers(sp)for wearing a T-shirt in support of the troops, the Capitol police admitted the mistakes and dropped all charges and offer apology.

[DiscoMan]

During the war in Vietnam, Republic of; I was very active in the anti-war movement during the late '60s. I was out of it by the summer of 1970 because I just could no longer tolerate being in close proximity too or associated with people like Cindy Sheehan.
They actually turned my stomach. :evil:
Their "fervor for dissent" is only a cover for their rabid anti-American, anti-capitalist communist sympathies.

[paul]

Originally Posted by Mixmachine

they should have stopped her at the border after she came back from the meeting with every enemy on the USA in Venezuela, especially those that would like nothing more that starve and murder you and your family, but of course you can't find that link either...

She's using the death of her son, that decided to serve his country (not she!!!)for political reasons, and she's financed and supported by leftist from all over the world now, including your friend Yugo, she calls Iraqui murdering terrorist "Freedom fighters" insulting the memory of all those she claims to represent in her shirt, a remark especially insulting to the families of other fallen soldiers the majority of which cannot stand the fucking bitch!!!!!

By the way I'm sure Salon.com didn't report it, and since you are such an *unbias* guy you decided to keep out, the Wife of a Republican Senator was also removed from the chambers(sp)for wearing a T-shirt in support of the troops, the Capitol police admitted the mistakes and dropped all charges and offer apology.

About the only thing you may be close to getting right Mix is I haven't seen the "wife" story in Salon.
As usual though, you are way off base. The "wife", Beverly Young was ejected. Cindy was cuffed, removed, and arrested. She had to spend a little time in jail. I suspect in their nazi zeal to make sure nothing looks bad for bush, they swept up one of their own. I'm amused by this because I expect more of these people who support this criminal's tactics to get caught by "accident."
As for Cindy meeting with Chavez, nothing pleases me more. I suspect the people in Mass. and Pennsylvania benefitting from reduced heating oil prices courtesy of Chavez feel a little differently.
You may not like this but as far as Iraqi's are concerned, they are freedom fighters. I didn't know Bush got an invitation from iraqi's to invade their country and occupy it with American soldiers. I don't know where your common sense is but whenever a foreign army invades a country, the citizens of that country will be rightly viewed as freedom fighters. Our soldiers are merely following orders from a guy that skated his way out of 'Nam.
Would it surprise you that there are about 50 Iraqi war vets running for political office. With the exception of a few, all are running as Dems.
I know this wont register with ya cause you are such a good little brown shirt 8)

[paul]

Originally Posted by DiscoMan

During the war in Vietnam, Republic of; I was very active in the anti-war movement during the late '60s. I was out of it by the summer of 1970 because I just could no longer tolerate being in close proximity too or associated with people like Cindy Sheehan.
They actually turned my stomach. :evil:
Their "fervor for dissent" is only a cover for their rabid anti-American, anti-capitalist communist sympathies.

You are always welcome to come back home Discoman. Don't confuse patriotism with blind allegiance to a leader. Without dissent we have no freedom.
America has done good things. America has done awful things. If we are to be great or remain great we have to passionately fix the things we are failing at. Otherwise, as it appears now, this experiment in self rule is over and we will wind up in a ash heap filled with other nations brought down by their own evils.

[Videoskooter]

I really hope (really, really) that one of these days I don't open this board and read a topic "Paul arrested".

You always say: "everybody has his rights" but speaking in terms of a "crime family" again and again, can and will get you in trouble.

And that has nothing to do with fascism whatsoever, it has to do with legal matters and laws. In Belgium you would already be indicted for writing this and we are not a fascist state. When you accuse somebody of criminal conduct, you have to come up with hard and proven facts. And remember you ARE an American and he is YOUR President!

You can agree with his political views and actions or not but please be careful how you express your concerns, coz' they are reading this, you know that!

I want your opinion on this:

If you follow the world-press a little bit, you know what's happening in Europe right now after some papers have placed a few cartoons about the prophet Mohammed. Countries and it's citizens are threatened by the great Arabian democracies(?).

So, what do you prefer, an American government that is taking measures to prevent world domination by Islamic fundamentalists or do you really want to live in a society ruled by Islamic laws????

I made my choice, you know! My preferred society is not dictated by morons like Yugo"Commie" Chavez or by Ayatollahs, mine is backed by people like your President, even if it means giving up some rights.

No Taleban at my party :evil:

And about the fact of "monitoring communications" whic h you find so horrible, I reply with the words of your President: "Are we gonna do nothing and sit back till' we are hit again?".

Don't let people like Sheehan drag you into wrong decisions, pal!

[paul]

Hey Johan, first let me acquaint with something I wont expect you to know. Discoman and especially Mix, may detest this little document, I know the criminal in the White House does. It serves as the foundation for this nation.

THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Amendments 1-10 of the Constitution

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

The Conventions of a number of the States having, at the time of adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added, and as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government will best insure the beneficent ends of its institution;

Resolved, by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two-thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States; all or any of which articles, when ratified by three-fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes as part of the said Constitution, namely:


Amendment I
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.


Amendment II
A well regulated militia, being necessary to the security of a free state, the right of the people to keep and bear arms, shall not be infringed.


Amendment III
No soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.


Amendment IV
The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.


Amendment V
No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a grand jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the militia, when in actual service in time of war or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offense to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.


Amendment VI
In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the state and district wherein the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the assistance of counsel for his defense.


Amendment VII
In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise reexamined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.


Amendment VIII
Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.


Amendment IX
The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.


Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This is what as of 2/2/06 allows me and every one in this nation to speak freely. Granted, the often stated "yelling fire in a crowded theater" is illegal. But it is to be understood that our rights are bracketed by other rights in the interest of serving the common good. Bottom line in this example is yelling fire falsely in a theater risk people dying through trampling, thus emminent bodily harm trumps speech. Don't feel sorry for the criminal in the white house. You should have heard the right wing nuts when Clinton was president. They went after him, Hillary and the their daughter, Chelsea. These people are detestable. In fact from time to time they still freely express there hatred for the Clintons with whatever invectives their feeble minds can conjure up.
Your question is philosophically best described as a strawman argument. The choice is either radical fundamentalist Islam or Fascism as prescribed by the bush crime family. This is a weak argument because neither is the framework upon which this nation was built. To say we have to take away freedoms to ensure freedoms is a nonsensical argument. To do it the bush way by spying on citizens illegally for example or to lose to radical fundamentalism be it Islamic or Christian destroys freedoms. Indeed, it would be spitting in the faces of those who have fought to ensure the freedoms we say we cherish with either choice.
No Johan, what I and many Americans want is to follow the law and that rest in the Constitution and The Bill Of Rights.
As for my terminology, the bush crime family, I am not only free (as of 2/2/06) to say it. It is also with merit. From grandpappy bush who illegally supported the nazi regime, to Neal, Jeb, George, and George W., who robbed the Savings and Loan in the '80s, to laura bush running over a boyfriend in a car accident, to this illegal war in Iraq, the outing of a cia agent, and the illegal spying on us residents by "w." There's more. It just goes on and on with the bush crime family!

[Videoskooter]

Paul, in Belgium, offending the head of state is punishable by law! If you would write this way about our King (as a Belgian citizen of course) you would be indicted right now. I'm serious.

So, the Clintons were law-obieding-citizens? That's something new to me! Lying under oath, tax evasion, fraud? Convicted? No! They sure got away with it :lol:

Paul, I don't know if you are a smoker, but I'll send you a cigar :lol:

BTW, for the readers that haven't followed the recent developments on the European papers:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe...rap/index.html

[paul]

Originally Posted by Videoskooter

Paul, in Belgium, offending the head of state is punishable by law! If you would write this way about our King (as a Belgian citizen of course) you would be indicted right now. I'm serious.
Fortunately (and I agree), in the states this does not apply. They are trying to skirt this with the fatherland, err patriot act though.

So, the Clintons were law-obieding-citizens? That's something new to me! Lying under oath, tax evasion, fraud? Convicted? No! They sure got away with it :lol:
This may help dispel the lies.
http://www.snopes.com/inboxer/outrage/clinton.htm

Paul, I don't know if you are a smoker, but I'll send you a cigar :lol:

I don't smoke but I'll take the cigar if you can get Salma to put it where I like it

BTW, for the readers that haven't followed the recent developments on the European papers:

http://www.cnn.com/2006/WORLD/europe...rap/index.html
I did follow this story and I also have a problem with this. This goes back to Rushdie for me. Islam in my view is in need of reformation.

[Videoskooter]

Originally Posted by paul

I don't smoke but I'll take the cigar if you can get Salma to put it where I like it

Paul, behave!

Maybe Condi has forgiven you all the leftist nonsense you've written here, but the Salma-remark.....oh man, you're in deep trouble now :o

BTW, today almost all the Belgian newspapers have published the controversial cartoons under the title "Freedom of press will not be attacked by 1 religion". Italian newspapers are also following in.

[Mixmachine]

To say we have to take away freedoms to ensure freedoms is a nonsensical argument. To do it the bush way by spying on citizens illegally for example or to lose to radical fundamentalism be it Islamic or Christian destroys freedoms

I 'm not going to waste to much time debating this Lefty Paul again especially after the amount of BS he believes and has posted around here, (Like Bush allowed 9/11 to happen) is funny how he has the edacity to call me (or any one else) an extremist :lol: :lol: iif that don't beat all :lol:

Anyways , is doubling insulting to read here from a supporter of leftist regimes around the world who’s free to call the Bush family “criminals” that he’s concern with the erosion of freedom of speech in America, (according with his lunatic exaggerated unfounded claims )especially since the regimes he so strongly supports around the world, once they are in power have never shown any of their opponents the rights he so strongly demands here in America, (Check Cuba, USSR, and now Venezuela) leftist regimes usually line up their opponents by the wall or imprison them for years for expressing a fraction of what he’s free to say in the USA, and yet he and Cyndi Sheehan’s ilk (Belafonte, Glover) promote this leftist dictators as true examples of democratic leaders and democratic governments. :lol: Poor misguided souls, they really think every one else is as ignorant as they are.

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...a/13680381.htm

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...a/13704325.htm

Hey Paul, read this for more proof of what happens to dissidents in that beautiful leftist utopia that useful fools like you left behind for Cubans to enjoy..

http://www.miami.com/mld/miamiherald...s/13779739.htm



It is really a shame that the Democratic party has been high jacked by reactionary leftist wackos (like Lefty Paul here ) from all corner of the left field, and a once vigorous party with honorable and sensible leader has deteriorated into party without any new ideas to offer and increasingly resorting to unimaginable stunts ( Supreme court nominee filibuster attempt crushingly defeated) and national televised prime time insults (insulting applause during the State of Union led by former first “Lady” Hillary never seen before in that chamber) It would serve this leftists well to pick up an American history book and read about the actions of President Roosevelt during WWII, a Democrat that was strong enough to deny our enemies (domestic and not) to use the constitution to destroy America.

Roosevelt interned all Japs and prohibited the press from reporting sensitive disclosures damaging to America's security and the war effort, and captured German saboteurs and spies were promptly executed with out much fanfare, if the need ever arises here in America again I hope we have in the White House sensible American that will realize that the “Bill of rights” is not of any use after you allowed our enemies to buried you six feet under.

America, can you really trust any of the current crop of flunky Democrats kicking around to defend your family like Roosevelt once did?

[Videoskooter]

Originally Posted by Mixmachine

Anyways , is doubling insulting to read here from a supporter of leftist regimes around the world who’s free to call the Bush family “criminals” that his concern with the erosion of freedom of speech in America, (according with his lunatic exaggerated unfounded claims )especially since the regimes he so strongly supports around the world, once they are in power have never shown any of their opponents the rights he so strongly demands here in America, (Check Cuba, USSR, and now Venezuela) leftist regimes usually line up their opponents by the wall or imprison them for years for expressing a fraction of what he’s free to say in the USA.

Mix, that's what I'm trying to say but Paul just won't admit it. The fact that he's posting all this for weeks/months now, proves that he LIVES in a DEMOCRACY but he's too blind to see it :o

And his defense of the Clinton Bunch. OMG, that's what U need over there in 2008. Hilary in the White House :roll: Mr. and Mrs. Whitewater ruling the world.

Give him a few days and he will propose Yugo Chavez as the saviour of the USA.

Paul, wake up!!!!!

Chavez And The Crazy Ayatollahs: a band that will rock your world!